ROLE OF GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN ASSESSING AND ENSURING SLOPE STABILITY IN INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

Dr. Sanjay Rana, Director, PARSAN
sanjay@parsan.biz

Abstract

This paper explores the critical role of geophysical investigations in ensuring slope stability for infrastructure projects. It underscores the importance of these techniques in accurately assessing subsurface conditions that are pivotal for slope stability. The paper details the application and advantages of various geophysical methods such as Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW), Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI), and Seismic Refraction Tomography (SRT). These methods provide invaluable insights into the geotechnical properties of slopes, aiding in the development of effective stabilization strategies. By integrating geophysical data with geological and geotechnical information, the paper demonstrates how a comprehensive approach to slope stability can lead to safer and more sustainable infrastructure development. The study also includes case studies to illustrate the practical applications of these techniques and discusses the latest advancements in geophysical methods for future applications in slope stability assessment. The aim is to provide a detailed overview of how geophysical investigations can significantly contribute to mitigating risks associated with slope instability in infrastructure projects.

INTRODUCTION

The stability of slopes is a critical concern in the development and maintenance of infrastructure projects, as failures can lead to significant economic losses, environmental damage, and potential loss of life. The complexity of slope stability assessment arises from the interaction of various factors such as soil composition, moisture content, geological structures, and external loads (Krahn, 2003). Traditional methods of slope stability analysis often rely on surface observations and limited subsurface sampling, which may not adequately represent the complex subsurface conditions.

In this context, geophysical investigations offer a non-invasive and cost-effective approach to assess subsurface conditions. Common geophysical methods used in slope stability studies include Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), which is effective in delineating shallow subsurface features (Jol, 2008); Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW), useful for mapping variations in soil stiffness (Park et al., 1999); Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI), which can identify moisture variations and potential seepage paths in slopes (Loke, 2004); and Seismic Refraction Tomography (SRT), capable of imaging deeper subsurface layers (Miller et al., 2010).

The integration of these geophysical techniques provides a more comprehensive understanding of the subsurface conditions, thereby enhancing the reliability of slope stability assessments.

One of the primary applications of geophysical investigations in infrastructure projects is in road construction. By assessing slope stability, engineers can identify potential hazards such as landslides or slope failures that may impact the safety and durability of roads. Geophysical techniques can provide a comprehensive understanding of the subsurface conditions, including the presence of weak zones, groundwater levels, and the integrity of the slope materials.

Similarly, in bridge construction projects, geophysical investigations help engineers evaluate the stability of slopes adjacent to bridge abutments and piers. By identifying potential slope instability, engineers can design appropriate foundation systems and implement slope stabilization measures to ensure the safety and structural integrity of the bridge.

In dam construction projects, geophysical investigations are crucial for assessing and ensuring slope stability. The presence of weak zones or seepage paths can compromise the stability of dams, leading to catastrophic failures. Geophysical techniques can detect these potential risks and provide valuable information for designing effective slope stabilization measures.

Geophysical investigations also play a vital role in railway, pipeline, building, tunnel, airport runway, coastal infrastructure, and underground mining projects. By assessing and ensuring slope stability, engineers can prevent accidents, reduce maintenance costs, and extend the lifespan of these infrastructure projects.

This paper aims to elaborate on the principles, applications, and benefits of these geophysical methods in the context of slope stability in infrastructure projects.

GEOPHYSICAL METHODS FOR SLOPE STABILITY

Geophysical investigations are essential tools that enable engineers to analyse and understand the subsurface conditions of slopes. By employing various geophysical techniques, such as seismic refraction, electrical resistivity, ground-penetrating radar, engineers can gather crucial information about the internal composition, structure, and stability of slopes. This information is invaluable in assessing potential risks and hazards associated with slope instability, enabling engineers to make informed decisions and design appropriate mitigation measures. Few of the applicable geophysical methods for slope stability studies are presented in this section.

Ground Penetrating Radar:

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is a non-invasive geophysical method highly effective in detecting and mapping subsurface features crucial for assessing slope stability. GPR operates by emitting high-frequency electromagnetic waves into the ground. These waves, when reflected by subsurface structures, are captured by the radar system. This technique is particularly effective in delineating geological layers, voids, fractures, and variations in moisture content, which are all key factors in evaluating slope stability.

One of the primary advantages of GPR in slope stability studies is its ability to provide high-resolution images of the subsurface. This level of detail is invaluable for identifying potential weak zones within slopes that could lead to failure. The accuracy and depth of penetration of GPR depend on factors like soil type, moisture content, and the frequency of the radar used.

Moreover, advancements in GPR technology have improved its applicability in complex geological settings, enabling more precise and reliable assessments of slope stability. When integrated with other geotechnical data, GPR contributes significantly to a comprehensive understanding of slope conditions, thereby aiding in the development of effective mitigation strategies.

In the study by Jol (2008), the principles and applications of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) in geophysical surveys, including slope stability assessments, are comprehensively explored. Jol emphasizes the high-resolution capabilities of GPR in detecting subsurface anomalies and stratigraphic features, which are crucial in evaluating slope stability.The 2024 study by Tiancheng Wang et al. delves into the practical application of GPR for identifying complex slope subsurface strata. This research demonstrates GPR’s effectiveness in real-world scenarios, highlighting its accuracy in mapping various soil and rock interfaces and its utility in slope stability assessment.

In many cases, slope failures and ground collapses are observed because of both the presence of buried debris as well as focused groundwater erosion in the subsurface. GPR can be effectively used to detect such subsurface features effectively.

Fig.1: Detection of a void using Ground Penetrating Radar

Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)

Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) is a sophisticated geophysical method that has gained prominence for its effectiveness in determining soil properties relevant to slope stability, particularly soil stiffness. This technique is based on the generation and analysis of surface waves, which are affected by the underlying soil’s mechanical properties. By measuring the velocity of these waves, MASW can deduce the shear-wave velocity profile of the ground, which is directly correlated with soil stiffness (Park et al., 1999).

The detailed soil stiffness profiles obtained from MASW are invaluable for geotechnical engineers in assessing the stability of slopes. The method’s ability to provide depth-resolved stiffness profiles helps in identifying layers within the soil that may be susceptible to failure under certain conditions, such as heavy rainfall or seismic activity (Xia et al., 1999). Furthermore, MASW’s non-invasive approach makes it an attractive option for slope stability investigations, as it minimizes the disturbance to the slope being studied.

One of the key strengths of MASW is its adaptability to various geological settings. Whether dealing with homogeneous soils or complex stratified layers, MASW can effectively map out the stiffness variations, providing essential data for slope stability models. This data is crucial not only for identifying potential failure zones but also for designing appropriate slope stabilization measures.In recent advancements, MASW has been integrated with other geophysical methods, such as GPR and ERI, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of subsurface conditions affecting slope stability. This integrative approach enables a holistic assessment, ensuring that all critical factors influencing slope stability are adequately addressed.

Fig.2: Shear Wave Profile from MASW

Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI)

Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI) is an advanced geophysical technique that has become indispensable in assessing slope stability. This method measures the electrical resistivity of subsurface materials to create a detailed image of the subsurface structure, which is essential for identifying variations in soil and rock properties. The efficacy of ERI lies in its ability to detect changes in moisture content, which significantly influence the mechanical properties of soils and rocks.

Increased moisture content can lead to a reduction in soil strength and an increase in the likelihood of slope failures. By mapping these variations, ERI aids in pinpointing areas that are more susceptible to landslides or other forms of slope instability. Additionally, ERI can identify the presence of subsurface water flow paths, which are critical in understanding the movement of water through soil and rock strata and its impact on slope stability.

The integration of ERI data with other geotechnical information, such as borehole logs and surface geology data, provides a comprehensive understanding of slope conditions. This integrated approach is crucial for designing effective slope stabilization measures and for conducting risk assessments related to slope stability.

ERI’s non-destructive and versatile nature makes it suitable for a wide range of environments, from urban to remote areas, enhancing its utility in diverse geotechnical applications. The technique’s ability to provide detailed subsurface images over large areas makes it a valuable tool in preliminary site investigations and in monitoring the effectiveness of implemented stabilization measures over time.

For an in-depth understanding of ERI’s role in slope stability, studies like Loke (2004) offer detailed analyses and case studies illustrating the practical applications and benefits of this technique in geotechnical engineering.

Figure-3: 2D Electrical Resistivity Imaging/ Tomography section showing a cavity (blue colour low resistivity zone between 24-40m) at proposed bridge pier location.

Seismic Refraction Tomography (SRT)

Seismic Refraction Tomography (SRT) is an advanced surface-based geophysical technique primarily used in slope stability assessments to identify subsurface layers and structural features. This method involves the generation and analysis of seismic waves, which travel along the surface and refract when encountering different subsurface layers. SRT provides a more detailed and accurate understanding of subsurface geology compared to traditional seismic refraction methods.

The strength of SRT in slope stability lies in its ability to map the depth, thickness, and properties of subsurface layers, which are critical in understanding the geotechnical characteristics of slopes. By providing detailed images of these layers, SRT can reveal hidden features such as fault zones, weak zones, or variations in bedrock depth, which are vital for accurate slope stability analysis.

SRT’s application in slope stability is particularly beneficial in areas with complex geological conditions, where understanding the subsurface structure is crucial for predicting and preventing slope failures. The method’s surface-based nature also makes it suitable for use in a wide range of environments, from urban settings to remote natural slopes.

In conclusion, SRT offers a comprehensive approach to slope stability assessment, allowing for more informed decision-making in the management of slope-related risks in infrastructure projects.For further exploration into the technical aspects and field applications of SRT, the study by Miller et al. (2010) is a valuable resource. This research provides a thorough examination of SRT’s capabilities in engineering, environmental, and mining applications, offering insights into its practical implementation in various geological settings.

Fig.4: Thickness and topography of various subsurface layers revealed by Seismic Refraction Tomography

Crosshole seismic tomography

Crosshole seismic tomography is a geophysical method that uses seismic waves to image the internal structure of the subsurface between two or more boreholes. It can be used to assess the soil properties and stability of slopes, especially in areas where surface methods may have limitations (Asteris et al., 2022; Becht et al., 2007).

Crosshole seismic tomography can measure the seismic velocity and attenuation of the soil, which are related to its density, porosity, water content, and strength. These parameters can indicate the presence of fractures, faults, voids, or other heterogeneities that may affect the stability of the slope (Becht et al., 2007).

Crosshole seismic tomography can also provide information on the anisotropy and directionality of the soil, which can reflect its stress state and deformation history. This can help to evaluate the potential failure modes and mechanisms of the slope, such as sliding, toppling, or buckling (Becht et al., 2007).

Crosshole seismic tomography can achieve high resolution and accuracy, as it eliminates the depth-related restrictions and interference of surface methods. It can also cover a large area and depth range, depending on the number and spacing of the boreholes. It can be applied to various types of slopes, such as natural, artificial, or mixed ones (Asteris et al., 2022).

Crosshole seismic tomography can be combined with other geotechnical and geophysical methods, such as borehole logging, refraction tomography, or geotechnical modelling, to obtain a comprehensive and reliable characterization of the slope. This can help to design effective and efficient remediation and mitigation measures for the slope stability (Asteris et al., 2022).

Fig.5: Fault Zone Detection by Crosshole Seismic Tomography (Courtesy SolgeoSrl, Italy)

Electromagnetic methods

Electromagnetic methods are geophysical methods that measure the electrical conductivity of the soil, which can indicate the presence of water, clay, or metallic objects. They can also detect changes in the soil structure due to landslides or erosion (Hack, 2007). Some examples of electromagnetic methods are:

Ground conductivity scanning: This method uses a device that emits an electromagnetic field and measures the response of the soil. It can provide a quick and continuous mapping of the soil conductivity, which can reflect the moisture content and the presence of clay or metal. It can also identify zones of high or low conductivity that may correspond to potential slip surfaces or cavities (Dowding, 1996).

Frequency domain electromagnetics: This method uses a transmitter and a receiver that operate at different frequencies and measure the amplitude and phase of the electromagnetic field. It can provide information on the depth and lateral variation of the soil conductivity, which can indicate the water table level and the distribution of clay or metal. It can also detect anomalies that may be related to landslides or erosion (Hack, 2007).

Electrolytic bubble inclinometers and tiltmeters: These methods use sensors that measure the inclination or tilt of the soil, which can reflect the deformation or displacement of the slope. They can provide continuous and accurate monitoring of the slope stability and detect early signs of failure or movement (Dowding, 1996).

Gravity methods

Gravity methods are geophysical methods that measure the variations in the gravitational field of the earth, which can reflect the density and mass distribution of the subsurface. They can detect the presence of cavities, voids, or dense materials that may affect the slope stability (Hack, 2007). Some examples of gravity methods are:

Microgravity: This method uses a gravimeter to measure the small changes in the gravity field caused by the subsurface density contrasts. It can provide high-resolution mapping of the subsurface features, such as faults, fractures, or cavities, that may influence the slope stability. It can also estimate the depth and volume of the anomalies by using inversion techniques (Hack, 2007).

Gravimetry: This method uses a gravimeter to measure the regional variations in the gravity field related to the large-scale density variations of the subsurface. It can provide information on the geological structure and stratigraphy of the slope, such as the thickness and dip of the layers, or the presence of intrusions or sedimentary basins. It can also identify the zones of high or low density that may correspond to potential slip surfaces or weak zones (Hack, 2007).

APPLICATION IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

Geophysical investigations play a crucial role in assessing and ensuring slope stability in various infrastructure projects. This section provides a comprehensive summary of the role of geophysical investigations in different construction projects, including road, bridge, dam, railway, pipeline, building, tunnel, airport runway, coastal infrastructure, and underground mining projects.

In road construction projects, geophysical investigations aid in evaluating the subsurface conditions, identifying potential slope failures, and determining the stability of embankments and cut slopes. By utilizing techniques such as ground penetrating radar, seismic surveys, and electrical resistivity imaging, engineers can accurately assess the slope stability and design appropriate mitigation measures.

Bridge construction projects also benefit from geophysical investigations as they help identify potential weak zones, assess the integrity of foundation materials, and detect hidden voids or cavities. Through methods like seismic refraction, seismic reflection, and borehole logging, engineers can ensure the stability of bridge structures and prevent any possible failures.

Dam construction projects require careful consideration of slope stability to prevent catastrophic events. Geophysical investigations, such as geoelectric surveys, seismic tomography, and resistivity profiling, provide valuable information about subsurface conditions, potential seepage paths, and the integrity of foundation materials. This knowledge enables engineers to design and construct stable and safe dams.

Railway, pipeline, and building construction projects also rely on geophysical investigations to assess slope stability and ensure the safety of the structures. Techniques like ground penetrating radar, seismic surveys, and electromagnetic methods help engineers identify potential hazards, such as landslides or subsidence, and design appropriate measures to mitigate these risks.

Tunnel construction projects benefit from geophysical investigations as they provide valuable information about the rock mass properties, presence of faults or fractures, and potential groundwater inflow. By using methods such as seismic tomography, borehole logging, and electrical resistivity imaging, engineers can assess the slope stability and design effective support systems for tunnel excavation.

Airport runway and coastal infrastructure projects require geophysical investigations to assess slope stability and prevent any potential hazards that may compromise the safety of these structures. Techniques like airborne LiDAR, ground penetrating radar, and electrical resistivity imaging help engineers identify potential landslides, subsidence, or erosion, allowing for proper design and maintenance measures.

Finally, underground mining projects heavily rely on geophysical investigations to assess the slope stability and identify potential risks associated with mining activities. By utilizing techniques such as seismic surveys, gravity surveys, and electromagnetic methods, engineers can evaluate the stability of underground slopes and ensure safe mining operations.

Geophysical investigations are crucial in assessing and ensuring slope stability in various infrastructure projects. By employing a range of techniques and methods, engineers can accurately evaluate the subsurface conditions, identify potential hazards, and design appropriate mitigation measures to ensure the safety and stability of these projects.

CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS OF GEOPHYSICAL TECHNIQUES

Geophysical investigations play a vital role in assessing and ensuring slope stability in various infrastructure projects. However, these techniques are not without their challenges and limitations. In this section, we will explore the key obstacles that engineers may encounter when conducting geophysical investigations and how these limitations can impact the accuracy and reliability of slope stability assessments.

One of the main challenges of geophysical techniques is the complex nature of the subsurface. Different geological formations, soil types, and groundwater conditions can significantly affect the interpretation of geophysical data. Engineers must carefully analyse and interpret the data, taking into account these variations to accurately assess slope stability.

Another limitation is the inherent uncertainty in geophysical measurements. Geophysical techniques provide indirect information about the subsurface, and factors such as noise, artifacts, and data resolution can introduce uncertainties in the results. Engineers must be aware of these limitations and use complementary techniques, such as borehole drilling and laboratory testing, to validate and refine the geophysical data.

In addition, geophysical investigations are highly dependent on the equipment and technology used. Different techniques, such as electrical resistivity, seismic refraction, and ground-penetrating radar, have their own limitations and are suitable for specific site conditions. Engineers must carefully select the appropriate technique and ensure that the equipment is calibrated and operated correctly to obtain reliable results.

Furthermore, geophysical techniques may not be suitable for all infrastructure projects. Certain site conditions, such as highly conductive soils or complex geological structures, can limit the effectiveness of these techniques. Engineers must consider these limitations and use a combination of geophysical and other site investigation methods to overcome these challenges and ensure accurate slope stability assessments.

Lastly, geophysical investigations require experienced professionals to interpret the data accurately. The complexity of the subsurface and the limitations of the techniques demand a high level of expertise in geophysics and geotechnical engineering. Engineers must collaborate with experienced geophysicists to ensure that the data is correctly interpreted and used to make informed decisions regarding slope stability in infrastructure projects.

While geophysical techniques are valuable tools in assessing and ensuring slope stability in various infrastructure projects, they are not without their challenges and limitations. Engineers must be aware of these limitations and carefully consider the site conditions, equipment, and expertise required to obtain accurate and reliable results. By understanding and addressing these challenges, engineers can effectively utilize geophysical investigations to improve the safety and reliability of infrastructure projects.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENGINEERS IN IMPLEMENTING GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Hereunder are some key recommendations for engineers when implementing geophysical investigations in different construction projects.

* Understand the Project Requirements: Before conducting any geophysical investigation, engineers must thoroughly understand the requirements of the specific infrastructure project. This includes understanding the project scope, potential hazards, and the desired outcomes of the investigation. This knowledge will guide engineers in selecting appropriate geophysical methods and interpreting the results accurately.

1. * Choose the Right Geophysical Techniques: There are various geophysical methods available, such as seismic, electrical resistivity, ground-penetrating radar, and magnetometry. Engineers should carefully select the techniques that are most suitable for the specific project requirements.

1. * Conduct a Site Investigation: A detailed site investigation is essential before carrying out any geophysical survey. Engineers should examine the site conditions, including geological features, previous slope failures, and ground surface characteristics. This information will help in identifying potential areas of concern and determining the optimal survey locations.

1. * Use Multiple Geophysical Methods: To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the subsurface conditions, engineers should consider using multiple geophysical methods. Each technique has its limitations, and combining different methods can help validate the results and provide a more accurate interpretation of the subsurface conditions.

1. * Engage Experienced Geophysicists: Collaborating with experienced geophysicists is crucial in ensuring the success of geophysical investigations. These experts have the knowledge and expertise to design and execute the survey effectively, interpret the data accurately, and provide recommendations based on the findings.

1. * Integrating Geophysical Data with Geological and Geotechnical Information: Integrating geophysical data with geological and geotechnical information is essential for a holistic approach to slope stability analysis. Geophysical methods like GPR, MASW, ERI, and SRT provide critical subsurface information, but their effectiveness is greatly enhanced when combined with geological data (like rock types and structures) and geotechnical data (such as soil properties and borehole tests). This integration allows for a more comprehensive understanding of slope conditions, leading to better-informed decision-making in slope stabilization. It helps in identifying and mitigating potential risks more effectively, ensuring the safety and longevity of infrastructure projects. This multidisciplinary approach is crucial for accurate and reliable slope stability assessments.

1. * Regular Monitoring and Maintenance: Geophysical investigations are not a one-time process. Engineers should incorporate regular monitoring and maintenance programs to continually assess the slope stability and detect any potential changes over time. This proactive approach will help in identifying and addressing potential slope stability issues before they become significant problems.

By following these recommendations, engineers can optimize the implementation of geophysical investigations and make informed decisions to enhance the overall safety and stability of the construction projects.

ADVANCEMENTS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

The field of geophysical techniques for slope stability is rapidly evolving, with numerous advancements and potential future directions emerging. Recent years have seen significant technological improvements in instruments and data processing algorithms, enhancing the accuracy and depth of subsurface investigations.

One of the key advancements is the integration of different geophysical methods, such as combining GPR with ERI or MASW with SRT. This multi-method approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of subsurface conditions, leading to more accurate slope stability assessments. Enhanced data processing algorithms, including AI and machine learning, are being increasingly used to analyse geophysical data. These technologies can identify patterns and anomalies in data that might not be apparent through traditional analysis methods.

Another significant advancement is the increased resolution and depth penetration of geophysical instruments. For example, newer GPR systems offer higher resolution images, allowing for the detection of smaller subsurface features that could impact slope stability. Similarly, advancements in ERI and SRT technologies provide more detailed information about deeper subsurface layers.

The use of remote sensing technologies, such as LiDAR and satellite imagery, in conjunction with ground-based geophysical methods, is another area of growth. These technologies offer a broader perspective of slope stability, allowing for the assessment of large areas, which is particularly useful in remote or inaccessible regions.

Future directions in slope stability research include the development of more sophisticated, integrated models that combine geophysical, geological, and geotechnical data. These models would provide a more holistic view of slope stability, incorporating factors like climate change and human activities. Additionally, there’s an increasing focus on real-time monitoring systems, using sensors to continuously monitor slopes for any signs of instability. This approach could lead to early warning systems, significantly reducing the risks associated with slope failures.

Research is also being directed towards the environmental and economic aspects of slope stability. There’s a growing interest in developing sustainable and cost-effective methods for slope stabilization, considering the environmental impact of stabilization measures.

In summary, the field of geophysical techniques for slope stability is moving towards more integrated, accurate, and real-time monitoring approaches. These advancements not only enhance our understanding of slope stability but also contribute to safer and more sustainable infrastructure development.

CONCLUSION

The integration of advanced geophysical techniques in slope stability assessments has significantly enhanced our understanding and management of risks associated with slope failures in infrastructure projects. The use of methods such as GPR, MASW, ERI, and SRT has led to more detailed and accurate subsurface imaging, crucial for identifying potential weak zones and ensuring slope integrity. The evolution of these techniques, especially with the integration of AI and machine learning for data analysis, has improved the precision of assessments.

Moreover, the combination of different geophysical methods provides a more comprehensive view of the subsurface conditions, leading to a holistic approach in slope stability evaluation. This integration is essential in addressing the complex interplay of geological, geotechnical, and environmental factors that influence slope stability.

The advancements in geophysical technologies and their applications in slope stability have significant implications for infrastructure project management and safety. By providing more accurate and detailed data, these techniques enable engineers to design more effective mitigation strategies, reducing the risk of slope failures. Additionally, the potential for real-time monitoring systems offers a proactive approach to managing slope stability, allowing for early detection and intervention.

The ongoing research and development in this field are set to further enhance the capabilities of geophysical methods. Future directions, including the development of integrated models and sustainable stabilization practices, promise to make slope stability assessment and management even more effective and environmentally friendly.

In conclusion, the advancements in geophysical techniques for slope stability assessment represent a crucial step forward in ensuring the safety and longevity of infrastructure projects. As these technologies continue to evolve, they will play an increasingly vital role in managing geological risks and protecting both infrastructure and the environment.

REFERENCES

1. 1. Jol, H. M. (2008). Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications. Elsevier.
2. 2. Krahn, J. (2003). The 2001 R.M. Hardy Lecture: The limits of limit equilibrium analyses. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 40(3), 643-660.
3. 3. Loke, M. H. (2004). Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. Geotomo Software.
4. 4. Miller, R. D., Xia, J., Park, C. B., & Ivanov, J. (2010). Seismic Refraction Tomography for Engineering, Environmental, and Mining Applications. Near Surface Geophysics.
5. 5. Park, C. B., Miller, R. D., & Xia, J. (1999). Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics, 64(3), 800-808.
6. 6. Wang, T., Zhang, W., Li, J., Liu, D., & Zhang, L. (2024). Identification of Complex Slope Subsurface Strata Using Ground-Penetrating Radar. Remote Sensing, 16(2), 415.
7. 7. Xia, J., Miller, R. D., & Park, C. B. (1999). Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics, 64(3), 691-700.
8. 8. Asteris, P. G., Rizal, F. I. M., Koopialipoor, M., Roussis, P. C., Ferentinou, M., Armaghani, D. J., & Gordan, B. (2022). Slope stability classification under seismic conditions using several tree-based intelligent techniques. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1753
9. 9. Becht, O., Kühn, D., &Plinninger, R. J. (2007). Crosshole seismic tomography for geotechnical site investigation. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 12(4), 367-378
10. 10. Dowding, C. H. (1996). Instrumentation practice for slope monitoring. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Landslides (pp. 1339-1344)
11. 11. Hack, R. (2007). Geophysics for slope stability. Surveys in Geophysics, 28(2-3), 101-127